top of page

TSM Special Topic - Digital Engineering and Data Management Hub for Integrated Combat Systems

SAM.gov Special Notice Link: https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/2d8e98caeea74b0bb04d8e4dfd2c763e/view

Response Date: 1 May 2026 – 31 May 2026 at 12:00 PM Eastern Time

BACKGROUND:

The Department of the Navy, in support of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO), is seeking qualified vendors to submit solutions for a critical Digital Engineering and Data Management challenge. The objective of this Special Topic is to identify viable solutions to address the problem detailed below. In Phase 1, if assessed favorably against the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace Assessment Rubric and this notice, any such solutions will be entered into the CDAO Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace in a post-competitive “Awardable” status. In Phase 2, any “Awardable” submissions received in response to this Special Topic may become eligible for further consideration for award of a prototype agreement for this Special Topic.

 

The government is seeking commercial capabilities to provide a centralized "Hub" digital environment to serve as the authoritative source for the Integrated Combat System (ICS) Program information.

PAE Mission Systems is responsible for the development and delivery of the Integrated Combat System (ICS) across the Surface Fleet portfolio. The overarching objective of the PAE is to align the organization, processes, and resources to develop a common and tailorable ICS. Achieving this alignment is intended to drive efficiency, increase the speed of delivery, and elevate the quality of the combat system across all ICS platforms. To support these rapid development and integration goals, the program utilizes modern digital infrastructure, including the U.S. Navy Forge Development Environment (FDE) and associated hardware factory. For further background information on the program office responsible for the requirements described by this Special Topic, please see https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SAS2022/1100_ICS%20Engagement%20brief%2003302022_SAS_Distro%20A.pdf 

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:

Despite the modernization goals of the ICS program, current data management practices limit operational efficiency. The ICS program currently manages critical technical information, program data, and system models across a disparate set of digital platforms and siloed performer applications.

 

Vital program data is frequently delivered and trapped in static, non-interactive legacy formats (such as PDF files). Because this critical information is fragmented and dispersed across multiple Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) suppliers and stakeholders, it cannot be efficiently accessed, correlated, or leveraged in real time. This disconnected approach restricts the government's ability to perform dynamic analysis, ensure data integrity, and manage system configuration, ultimately limiting visibility, slowing integration, and increasing risk across the program lifecycle.

 

To resolve these inefficiencies, the program urgently needs a centralized "Hub" digital environment to serve as the designated authoritative system of record for all ICS information. A solution is required to replace static data silos with an interactive, scalable environment that can ingest and transform multiple data sources into a dynamic, model-based ecosystem. This Hub will improve program oversight, accelerate development, and enhance lifecycle management. To ensure seamless collaboration, the solution must provide a defined access control framework in which permissions and user roles are managed and appropriate access rights to the digital environment are granted to all required Department of War (DoW) personnel and authorized DoW contractor support.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING A SOLUTION AGAINST THIS SPECIAL TOPIC: Submissions for this Special Topic will only be accepted via the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace Page located here.  In order to be considered, responses must be submitted to the marketplace page no later than the response date deadline noted above.  Responses not submitted before the deadline will be excluded from further consideration for award.  After navigating to the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace page, click on one of two selections detailed below:

 

“New Registrants” – This will allow first time users to create a Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace Account. Once created, the new user will be allowed to access the submission workflow to create and submit a response to this Special Topic.

 

“Returning Users” – This will allow submitters with established accounts to access the submission workflow to create and submit a response to this Special Topic.

 

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:

The submission process for Phase 1 of this Special Topic consists of three steps:

  • Step I – Video pitch submission through the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace page.

  • Step II – Video submissions are assessed in accordance with the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace (TSM) assessment process and rubric.

    • Under the field for Strategic Focus Area within the submission workflow, select “Navy IWS Special Topic".

    • To identify that your video submission is being submitted against the “Digital Engineering and Data Management Hub for Integrated Combat Systems” TSM Special Topic, the title of your submission should start with “Navy IWS” and then continue with your specific title (e.g., Navy IWS: Quix13 Software Solution).

    • For the content of the video submission, all submissions must adhere to the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace guidelines and submission instructions (detailed within Section 7 of the TSM Announcement available here). As identified within the TSM Announcement, there are four required content elements that each video submission must address.

  • Step III – Solutions are assessed as awardable or non-awardable. Solutions that are assessed as awardable, at the sponsoring organization’s sole discretion, may proceed to Step IV below for further consideration and potential award. Solutions that are assessed as non-awardable will be excluded from further consideration for award. Vendors will be provided notice during Step III whether their responses will proceed to Step IV.

 

Phase 1 of this Special Topic will leverage the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace (TSM) to collect and assess solutions that address the above need. The TSM requires a video-based submission. For the content of the video submission, all submissions must adhere to the TSM guidelines and submission instructions (detailed within Section VII of the TSM Announcement available here). As identified within the TSM Announcement, there are four required criteria that each video submission must address.  Responses shall first identify the criteria associated with an explanation before providing the specific explanation of an approach to meet to any of the criteria. Responses shall detail the specific approach to meet the requirements included in the criteria. The four criteria are:

  1. Defining the Problem:

    • Responses shall explain how the vendor interprets and understands the problem description noted above. The explanation shall demonstrate this understanding, in particular the challenges described in the problem statement. Responses shall provide a general outline of how the vendor will solve the problem statement and provide a summary overview of the vendor’s approach in responding to Criteria 2-4 below.

  2. Accelerating the Mission:

    • The sponsoring activity seeks a Data Hub solution that delivers a centralized, interactive, model-based environment to manage and visualize hardware and software configurations and associated technical data across multiple Navy platforms. The response must explain how the solution ingests and normalizes diverse data sources into a structured, searchable, and linked environment. The response must explain how the solution enables configuration management, including traceability and version control. Solutions should leverage commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) cloud-native products to the maximum extent practicable, minimizing customization, and maximizing automation for data ingestion, transformation, and integration, and the degree of COTS utilization.  

    • It is required that the Data Hub solution interface with existing systems to ingest and exchange data streams across multiple data stores. It is required to provide program transparency through accessible, timely, and accurate program data. The response must therefore explain how the Data Hub solution delivers an interactive environment with both read/write and read-only access capabilities based on user roles. The response must explain how role-based access controls govern all access and data interactions, thus ensuring that the user has the appropriate visibility of data while protecting sensitive and proprietary information.

    • The response must explain how the solution will handle both structured and unstructured digital data formats, including structured datasets and tables, unstructured content such as documents, as well as data streams and scanned or image-based inputs derived from non-digital sources. The response must explain how the solution ingests, imports, and processes a range of data types, including but not limited to PDFs, Microsoft Office files (Word, Excel), images, engineering drawings, and system generated data streams. Thus, the solution must support transformation of unstructured and scanned inputs into searchable and usable digital formats. The response must also demonstrate how the Data Hub solution permits configuration and version management capabilities of hardware, software, and system interface data, including both logical and physical configurations. Finally, the response must explain how the solution will permit extraction of data from the Hub to other government systems.

  3. Advancing the State of the Art:

    • Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution serves as a “single source-of-truth” (in other words, a “one-stop-shop”) for comprehensive data across US Navy’s surface combat systems, supporting requiring activity customers & stakeholders (including internal requiring activity staff). The response shall explain how the solution manages data beyond core hardware and encompasses the full program lifecycle, including system and component specifications; configuration hardware, software, and firmware baselines; integrated product support and sustainment data (i.e. supply support, inventory, provisioning, maintenance planning, technical manuals, technical data, procedures, sustaining engineering, etc.

    • Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution will be integrated into the government owned cloud environment, in particular, how the solution may be hosted in an Impact Level 5 and 6 (IL5 and IL6). The response shall explain how the solution permits both the extraction and import of data from the IL5 instance into IL6.

    • Government teams will determine what content will be housed in the Data Hub solution. Therefore, the response shall explain how the Data Hub solution is intuitive, logically and pragmatically constructed, so users can easily navigate to the content contained within. The response shall explain how Data Hub solution has the ability to designate and compartmentalize (“wall off”) any performer-specific data to ensure protection of all performer-specific data.

  4. Business Model:

    • Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution ensures robust data governance across all ingested and managed data sources, including defined rules for data quality, accuracy, and integrity. Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution ensures that data is consistent, reliable, and suitable for operational use. Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution has the capability to use automation to analyze and produce tailored reports on all data contained within. ·   

 

The submission process for Phase II of this Special Topic consists of five steps:

 

  • Step IV - The government may elect to conduct negotiations with or request white paper submissions from one, some, all or none of the entities whose video submissions are determined awardable.

  • Step V – White paper responses submitted

  • Step VI – White paper responses evaluated

  • Step VII – Negotiation of RFP with some (or none) of vendors that submitted white papers

  • Step VIII – Award of some (or none) of prototype project.

 

NOTE ON POTENTIAL FUTURE ACTIVITIES:

The objective of this Special Topic is to identify viable solutions to address the problem detailed below. In Phase 1, if assessed favorably against the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace Assessment Rubric, any such solutions will be entered into the CDAO Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace in a post competitive “Awardable” status. In Phase 2, “Awardable” submissions received in response to this Special Topic may become eligible for further consideration for award of a prototype agreement for this Special Topic.

TSM Special Topic - OUSW R&E CDAO Enterprise Autonomy Division: Advanced Data Labeling

SAM.gov Special Notice Link: https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/f626f7f1b451474eafb4bdc730f7bed7/view

Response Date: June 09, 2026, 12:00PM EST

 

I. BACKGROUND

The Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) Enterprise Autonomy Division provides enterprise capabilities to support the development and fielding of artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems across the Department of War (DoW). This portfolio includes the curation and management of data for the purposes of training computer vision (CV) models used within autonomous platforms.

 

While CDAO has existing labeling capabilities and a vast repository of data for training AI algorithms, warfighter needs demand that CDAO continue to research and evaluate new labeling providers as the industry rapidly evolves due to technological advances and generative AI.

 

This Special Topic Opportunity is focused on advanced data labeling capabilities to prepare multimodal imagery for training and testing CV algorithms to be used within autonomous systems. This includes the labeling of fields and image characteristics necessary for informing autonomous platform maneuvers and precision guidance.

 

II. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

 

There is widespread interest throughout the DoW for enterprise-level data curation and labeling capabilities necessary for processing and preparing electro-optical / infrared (EO/IR) imagery and full-motion video (FMV) for training, validating, and testing CV algorithms used within autonomous platforms.

 

The development of more advanced behaviors and decision-making schemas for autonomous systems has been constrained by the way training data has been labeled with bounding boxes and object classification. Labeled data limited to bounding boxes and object classification is insufficient for the development of the next generation of intelligent autonomous systems. Autonomous platforms across domains require additional information from the platform perception software to inform autonomous behaviors like object avoidance or maintaining standoff distance localized to a point on the object. 

 

Such information may include:

 

  • Weather conditions (e.g., sunny, cloudy, foggy, and rain)

  • Lighting conditions and source orientation

  • EO/IR sensor characteristics (e.g., type, resolution, look angle, and distortion factors)

  • Object environment and sensor domain (i.e., maritime, aerial, terrestrial, or sub-surface)

  • Object dimensions (e.g., length, and height)

  • Object pose, orientation, and bearing

  • Segmentation or boundaries of key object features

  • Percentage of object occlusion

  • Semantic segmentation of complex objects and scenes

 

The solution space for these capabilities is vast, so CDAO is pursuing solutions across a range of data labeling services and capabilities. Performers should provide solutions that address a subset of the information listed above and any additional information that the performer believes would be valuable for training autonomous systems.

 

III. THE OPPORTUNITY

Entities are invited to submit solutions against this opportunity that meet or exceed the desired capabilities described below. All submissions must be made to the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace, in conformance with the requirements, and processes identified within the official Tradewinds announcement available at SAM.gov. For the content requirements of the video submission, submitters shall follow the instructions in paragraph 4 below. Aside from the video content instructions identified in paragraph 4 below, submitting entities shall follow all requirements and processes within the Tradewinds Announcement v10.0, available on SAM.gov.

      A. Submissions against this opportunity will be collected between May 08, 2026, and June 09, 2026,  12:00PM EST. Reference the official Tradewinds Announcement for details on the solution submission process.

 

      B. When submitting solutions against this Topic, select ‘Special Topic Submission’ under the ‘Submission Type’ field, and ‘CDAO Data Labeling Special Topic’ under the ‘Relevant Strategic Focus Area’ field.

 

      C. To identify that your video submission is being submitted against the OUSW R&E CDAO Enterprise Autonomy: Advanced Data Labeling TSM Special Topic, the title of your video submission should start with “CDAO ADL:” and then continue with your specific title (e.g., CDAO ADL: Quix13 Software Solution).

 

      D. Solutions that are deemed compliant and received timely will be queued for an assessment beginning June 10, 2026, and concluded no later than 12:00PM EST on July 07, 2026.

 

      E. In accordance with the Tradewinds process, solutions will be assessed against the Tradewinds rubric (Appendix B of the Tradewinds Announcement (pages 23-24)) and assigned a rating of either ‘Awardable’ or ‘Non-awardable.’

 

      F. Participating entities will receive notification of their assessment rating on or immediately after the conclusion of the assessment period (July 07, 2026).

 

      G. Solutions assessed as awardable will be placed in the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace and made available for future procurement activities.

 

IV. DESIRED SOLUTION CAPABILITIES

For the content of the video submission against this opportunity, all submissions must adhere to the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace guidelines and submission instructions (TSM Announcement Section VII), and the below content instructions. As identified within the TSM Announcement, there are four required content elements that each video submission must address. Within each of the required content elements, for responses to this Special Topic, submitters shall include the following information:

  1. Defining the Problem (Address the following as part of TSM criteria 1):

    • The problem statement has already been defined (see paragraph 2 above). It  is recommended that minimal time be spent on problem identification, however, the vendor must clearly demonstrate how their proposed solution directly addresses the identified problem within the video submission.

  2. Accelerating the Mission (Address the following as part of TSM criteria 2):

    • Demonstrate how the technical solution provided satisfies the requirement to label imagery data in a way that enables advanced autonomous behaviors.

    • Where available, provide examples of systems that have been trained using the labeling capabilities presented and describe how the labeling enabled autonomous capability. 

    • Detail the ability of the proposed solution to operate on a government owned IL5 network.

  3. Advancing the State of the Art (Address the following as part of TSM criteria 3):

    • Submissions must be scalable and novel. Submissions should highlight how their labeling capabilities leverage cutting edge technologies and advance the state-of-the-art.

    • Detail the ability of the proposed solution to provide labels with the following format(s): COCO-style or MOT-style JSON for detections, segmentations, and key points with a DOTA-style extension for oriented bounding boxes and a BOP-style extension for 6 DoF pose and scale information, or an alternative approach. Where an alternative approach is proposed, ensure to identify and detail the alternative approach within the discussion of this criterion.

  4. Business Model (Address the following as part of TSM criteria 4):

    • Detail how the business model for the proposed solution supports long-term viability, encourages broader adoption of the solution, and provides a clear method of cost estimation for labeling efforts to include potential  future procurement on a fixed-price basis.


V. AWARDS

 

      A. All costs of preparing and submitting solution videos and submission forms are the responsibility of the submitting entity and not eligible for funding or reimbursement by the government.

 

      B. Assessment as “awardable” and placement into the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace does not guarantee any current or future award.

 

      C. The sponsor for this Special Topic (CDAO Enterprise Autonomy Division) has identified that future awards resulting from this opportunity, if any, may be made through prototype other transaction agreements under the authority of 10 USC 4022 and/or contract.

 

      D. Resources related to the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace process can be found at: https://www.tradewindai.com/tw-marketplace

bottom of page